Time in Consciousness


Does Time Exist Outside of Consciousness? 



Were you trying to understand how space-time works? Now you know it isn’t possible to precisely define time for all occasions. However, we say that time is a presence due to both motion and force and further, it is caused by the expansion of spaces. Normally, people refer to physical time and that means the public time and the time that clocks  measure. However, if there were not space, there may still be time. For as long as we have consciousness and objects, there must be time… but we really don’t have objects if there is no space. So if there are no objects when we have no space, do we have moments?

Is space-time fragmented, segmented into quantized bits of information, or causal sets? 


Is space-time smooth and continuous, with curves, bends, and warps; just as we think that is how Einstein had predicted?

Is what we call space-time even part of objective reality or is it just a mathematical construct that appeals to our perceptions?

Modern notions of quantum gravity and curved space-time can successfully be replaced with an infinitude of relative frames of reference, progressing and regressing though infinite series of relations, which imply the existence of multidimensional time.

If we say, consciousness projects objects; what is the source?

Would you like to explore a unique perspective about time and consciousness here?




We are about possibilities… perspectives, observations, deductions, reason, and more possibilities. Is it a maze? No, I think not. It is a dream. It is akin to multiple personality disorder (dissociation – dissociative identity disorder). Getting in touch with reality requires spiritual progress. Any information provided here is offered for entertainment purposes only. Discernment is always required.






One thought on “Time in Consciousness

  1. The Evolution of Time…

    The Evolution of Time and the Carnot Cycle at the Edge of the Universe

    By Gavin Wince

    We are all time travelers… drifting through time at a steady pace, one moment at a time. In what direction are we moving through time? Or does time move through us? How many dimensions of time are there? Though slightly allegorical, three-dimensional time offers physics new parameters, accounting for conventional and exotic physical phenomena, while maintaining the conservation of energy and symmetry groups found in physical law.

    I began playing with the idea that all of physics could be reduced to just interactions between spatial and temporal coordinates. I wondered if inertia and momentum might be composed strictly of temporal components. This would require extra time dimensions. Could inertia or momentum be used as indicators of multi-dimensional time? What about charge, spin, and other properties of matter? Answers to some of these questions appeared to reside in neutrino research, specifically neutrino flavor oscillation.

    The universality between Thermodynamics and Temporal Mechanics can reduce the fundamental forces of nature into a single expression, a new equivalence principle, which can be used as the generator for the evolution of time.

    Once Quantum Mechanics is seen through the lens of three-dimensional time, the EPR paradox looses its mystique. The speed of light may be restricted to a set speed limit within each individual frame of reference, however, frames of reference can undergo periods-of-time at varying rates of the passage-of-time.

    If the positive side of absolute zero is a state of condensed matter, what is on the negative side of absolute zero? Un-condensed matter?

    The anti-matter aspect of the Dirac equations may have been misinterpreted. The convention is to assume that “matter” is composed of “particles” distinctly different from “antimatter” composed of “antiparticles”. The assumption of one time dimension locks in this interpretation of the Dirac Equations. However, the uniform production of particles and antiparticles both in the laboratory and naturally, leads to the question: where is all of the antimatter that theoretically should have been produced with all the visible matter we see as our universe? Yet, if we apply our three-dimensional time loop to the Dirac Equation there is an alternative interpretation for this so-called “missing antimatter”.

    The Higgs particle data from both ATLAS and CMS appear to exhibit unintentional effects of quantum entanglement. Comparing the neutral Kaon mixing CP-violation and the neutral B-meson oscillation T-violation with the Higgs particle decay modes appear to demonstrate a new kind of symmetry breaking: M-Violation (mass).

    Without a beginning or an end, from the smallest to the largest, the universe emerges through up-welling from the infinitesimal depths of quantum fluctuations and cataclysmic eruptions amalgamating through a variety of entropic cycles of temporal loops.

    NOTE (by Eric): My understanding so far is that the author intends to describe the universe as continuously emerging from its source… perhaps to transform yet again in a new stage of expansion – to mature into a more perfect form?
    Any information provided here is offered for entertainment purposes only. Discernment is always required.
    In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work.

Make a comment please:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s